Smooth The Path

Member Informed Strategy, Innovation & Marketing

  • Home
  • Speaking
    • Presentations
    • Upcoming Events
    • Happy Event Organizers
    • Happy Participants
  • Services
    • Clients
  • Resources
    • Associations of the Future
    • New Member Engagement Study
    • Association Industry Innovation Research Study
    • New Strategies for Member Onboarding, Engagement, and Retention E-book
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact

February 13, 2017 By Amanda Kaiser

The Fundamental Attribution Error and Association Leadership

Why do high-performers become average performers? Often it is not their performance but rather the situation impacting them and this is particularly true when there is a leadership change. It is not uncommon to watch a highly-regarded employee plunge to average or worse upon working for a new manager. Why does this happen? Well, I don’t think it is because the contributor changes their output. Most of us are conscientious and hard working and will continue to give our jobs our best effort no matter who is in charge. Can we then attribute changes in performance not to the performer but rather to the leader?

Leaders come into their position with goals, communication styles, and biases that significantly impact their perceptions of what kind of performer someone is. And this might be the key. When we evaluate someone’s performance, we rate them as good or bad performer. We don’t typically think about their contribution as a good or bad performance.

The fundamental attribution error can explain this bias. I’ve heard the fundamental attribution error described this way: when someone blows by me on the highway going 20 miles-an-hour faster, and I am already speeding, I might think they are a risk-loving, dangerous nutball. Likely I will not wonder if they are late for a plane or a crucial doctor’s appointment.

Understanding the fundamental attribution error is important in association leadership because knowing this can help us improve performance where formerly we may not have known improvements existed. When we think someone is a bad performer their future performance is largely out of our hands. When instead we focus on the performance (a goal not met, a common stumbling block, a communication style issue, a process not used, etc.) helping them improve is on us.

Related posts:

  • The art of being a dependable association leader
  • Your association staff wants to be on a winning team
  • Create your personal knowledge acquisition plan

Filed Under: Association Leadership Tagged With: assessment, association leader, association leadership, cognitive bias, continuous improvement, contribution, errors, improvement, improving your skills, leadership, servant leader

Follow

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter
  • YouTube

Sign up for member insights & association inspiration.

Work With Me

Recent Posts

Association Strategy
Association Marketing
Association Innovation
Association Leadership
Association Value
Member Experience

Member Engagement
Member Research
Member Insights
Conference
Membership

Member Research

Blog

About

Happy Clients

Speaking

Popular Presentations

Contact Us

More Resources

Copyright © 2021 Amanda Kaiser